Is science a ladder or a bridge?

7 November 2026

By Linda Ferguson

Ladder reaching toward bright sky and sun flare.

Long before I started in NLP, it was attacked by academics and scientists. If you wonder what I mean, ask Wikipedia or an AI and you will notice that the tone is not objective: NLP is treated as nonsense acceptable only to quacks and the deluded.

What’s behind the attacks? Of course some NLP is bad. Some science is also bad. So that’s not it.

I think it’s a particular way of looking at knowledge, especially science, as a ladder that places some ideas (and, by extension, some people) above others.

This is, I suppose, one way to look at it. There is good science and bad science, and even mediocre science is more reliable than other forms of knowledge. Some of these forms of knowledge are practical: people use them successfully every day. Others are part of wisdom traditions that have survived for hundreds, or even thousands, of years.

But I’ve heard so many people make speeches based on the idea that science is somehow the highest form of knowledge and the people who practice it with big funding and large teams are also higher on some scale than the rest of us. And, like most dangerous attitudes, this mixes a little truth with a lot of bias and rhetoric.

I think there is a better way of looking at science. I believe that good science extends our ability to know the world around us, and to know the processes within us. And I think that the reason for building that ability is not to raise some of us up and keep others down, but to build bridges between people and between people and the world they inhabit.

Science at its best gives us a new way of seeing so that we can uncover common ground. There is no necessary conflict between science and poetry or science and philosophy or even science and spirituality. Science is not a combatant. It’s a way of establishing reality in terms that we can share even when we know in different ways and make different meaning from the same facts.

I chose to be certified as a neuroplastician because I believe that it connects me with other people who want to use science to build bridges, not ladders.

Share this post:

Related posts

Ladder reaching toward bright sky and sun flare.
7 November 2026

Is science a ladder or a bridge?

I’ve heard so many people make speeches based on the idea that science is somehow the highest form of knowledge and the people who practice it with big funding and large teams are also higher on some scale than the rest of us. And, like most dangerous attitudes, this mixes a little truth with a lot of bias and rhetoric. I think there is a better way of looking at science. I believe that good science extends our ability to know the world around us, and to know the processes within us. And I think that the reason for building that ability is not to raise some of us up and keep others down, but to build bridges between people and between people and the world they inhabit.
NLP Canada Training: woman in thoughtful pose in a blue layout.
31 October 2026

Why “space” backfires as a metaphor

Have you ever said, “I’d like to think about that, but I’m not in the right space for it.” Or maybe, “I’ll do it when I’m in a better space.” Generally, “space” is short for “head space” and it really means something like “I just don’t feel like thinking about that now.” But saying they’re not in the right space is a way of saying that their situation is somehow responsible for what they’re feeling. The danger in this is that it is partly true.
Painting of a canal with a wooden walkway, trees and a red brick house
3 October 2026

Transformation starts in the senses

People want reframing to start with cleverness, a James-Bond-like ability to use a gadget or a quick move to change who is winning. But the beginning of reframing is framing: putting edges around a situation so that you can focus on the details inside the frame. Life is a movement between the moment, full of vivid details, and the future, which is hazy, moving, or shifting. Without movement we are stuck. Without the moment, we are lost in the haze.